| Date |
Speaker |
Topic |
| 2/1/2013 |
Vikas Mittal
Rice
|
"When Does Recognition Increase Charitable Behavior? Toward A Moral Identity-Based Model" Abstract
Each year, individuals in the United States donate over $200 billion to charitable causes. Despite our lack of understanding of whether and how it increases charitable behavior, charities often offer recognition to motivate donor behavior. This research focuses on how the effectiveness of recognition on charitable behavior is dependent on the joint influence of two distinct dimensions of moral identity-internalization and symbolization. Three studies examining both monetary donations and volunteering behavior show recognition increases charitable behavior among those characterized by high moral identity symbolization and low moral identity internalization. Interestingly, those who are high in moral identity internalization are uninfluenced by recognition, regardless of their symbolization. By understanding correlates of the two dimensions of moral identity among donors, nonprofits can strategically recognize potential donors to maximize donation and volunteering behavior.
|
 |
| 2/15/2013 |
Wilhelm Hofmann
Chicago
|
"Everyday Temptations: An Experience Sampling Study of Desire, Conflict, and Self-Control" Abstract
How often and how strongly do people experience desires, to what extent do their desires conflict
with other goals, and how often and successfully do people exercise self-control to resist their
desires? To investigate desire and attempts to control desire in everyday life, we conducted a
large-scale experience sampling study based on a conceptual framework integrating desire strength,
conflict, resistance (use of self-control), and behavior enactment. A sample of 205 adults wore
beepers for a week. They furnished 7,827 reports of desire episodes and completed personality
measures of behavioral inhibition system/behavior activation system (BIS/BAS) sensitivity, trait
self-control, perfectionism, and narcissistic entitlement. Results suggest that desires are frequent,
variable in intensity, and largely unproblematic. Those urges that do conflict with other goals tend
to elicit resistance, with uneven success. Desire strength, conflict, resistance, and self-regulatory
success were moderated in multiple ways by personality variables as well as by situational and
interpersonal factors such as alcohol consumption, the mere presence of others, and the presence of
others who already had enacted the desire in question. Whereas personality generally had a stronger
impact on the dimensions of desire that emerged early in its course (desire strength and conflict),
situational factors showed relatively more influence on components later in the process (resistance
and behavior enactment). In total, these findings offer a novel and detailed perspective on the nature
of everyday desires and associated self-regulatory successes and failures.
|
 |
| 3/1/2013 |
David Bell
Wharton
|
"Offline Social Learning and Online Retail Trials" Abstract
Online retailing is the most dynamic part of the retail sector, yet when buying online,
consumers often face considerable uncertainty about non-digital product attributes. Firms
therefore employ creative and often costly methods such as two-way free shipping and pop-up
stores to help consumers resolve this problem of incomplete knowledge. We document
another key way this issue is mitigated-specifically, through information transmission in
naturally occurring social learning processes. Using consumer trial data from Bonobos.com,
the leading US online retailer for men's fashion apparel, we find that offline social learning
about non-digital attributes facilitates online retail trials. Furthermore, using data from the
Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey, we show that geographic variation in
"neighborhood social capital", the propensity for neighbors to trust each other and
communicate with each other in a local neighborhood, moderates the social learning process.
In particular, higher levels of social capital reduce inefficiencies in the social learning process.
The offline social learning process, and the moderating effect of social capital, both have an
economically important impact on new trials. Implications for new trial generation at online
retailers are discussed.
|
 |
| 3/8/2013 |
Andy Gershoff
UT Austin
|
"Feeling Finished and Feeling Smart: How Psychological Closure Affects Abstraction and Subjective Knowledge" Abstract
Consumers frequently gauge their product knowledge to decide whether they know enough to make a successful decision. We propose that psychological closure, a state of resolution that allows people to "move on," facilitates the mental wrap-up of a learning experience to a higher, more abstract level, causing consumers to feel more knowledgeable about the learned subject. Illuminating this mechanism, the effect of psychological closure on subjective knowledge is attenuated under concrete (vs. abstract) mindsets (studies 1-2) and mediated by perceived cohesiveness of the learning experience, an indication of abstract representation (study 3). Moderated mediation results demonstrate that wrapping up a learning experience concretely (vs. abstractly) prevents people from experiencing closure and, consequently, from feeling knowledgeable (study 4). Repeated-measures show heightened subjective knowledge as a result of closure becomes adjusted downwards after concrete cues are presented; the effect of closure on subjective knowledge is robust against high accuracy motivation (study 5).
|
| 3/22/2013 |
Doug Chung
Harvard
|
"The Dynamic Advertising Effect of Collegiate Athletics" Abstract
I measure the spillover effect of intercollegiate athletics on the quantity and quality of
applicants to institutions of higher education in the United States, popularly known as the
"Flutie Effect." I treat athletic success as a stock of goodwill that decays over time, similar to
that of advertising. A major challenge is that privacy laws prevent us from observing
information about the applicant pool. I overcome this challenge by using order statistic
distribution to infer applicant quality from information on enrolled students. Using a flexible
random coefficients aggregate discrete choice model-which accommodates heterogeneity in
preferences for school quality and athletic success-and an extensive set of school fixed effects
to control for unobserved quality in athletics and academics, I estimate the impact of athletic
success on applicant quality and quantity. Overall, athletic success has a significant long-term
goodwill effect on future applications and quality. However, students with lower than average
SAT scores tend to have a stronger preference for athletic success, while students with higher
SAT scores have a greater preference for academic quality. Furthermore, the decay rate of
athletics goodwill is significant only for students with lower SAT scores, suggesting that the
goodwill created by intercollegiate athletics resides more extensively with low-ability students
than with their high-ability counterparts. But, surprisingly, athletic success impacts
applications even among academically stronger students.
|
 |
| 3/29/2013 |
Thales S. Teixeira
Harvard
|
"Why, When and How Much to Entertain Consumers in Advertisements?
A Web-based Facial Tracking Field Study" Abstract
The presence of positive entertainment (e.g., visual imagery, upbeat music, humor) in TV
advertisements can make them more attractive and persuasive. However, little is known about
the downsides of using too much entertainment. This research focuses on why, when, and how
much to entertain consumers in TV advertisements. We collected data in a large-scale field
experiment using 82 ads with various levels of entertainment shown to 275 consumers in their
homes and workplaces. Using a novel web-based face tracking system, we continuously measure
consumers' smile responses, and viewing interest and purchase intent. A simultaneous Bayesian
Hierarchical model is estimated to assess how entertainment affects purchases by endogenizing
viewing interest. We find that entertainment has an inverted U-shape relationship with purchase
intent. Importantly, we separate entertainment into that which is associated with the brand versus
that which is not, and find that the former is directly positively associated with purchase intent
while the latter is not.
|
 |
| 4/5/2013 (10:00-11:30) |
Olivier Toubia
Columbia
|
"Intrinsic versus Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute
Content to Twitter?" Abstract
We empirically study the motivations of users to contribute content to social media in the context
of the popular microblogging site Twitter. We focus on non-commercial users who do not
benefit financially from their contributions. Previous literature suggests two main sources of
utility that may motivate these users to post content: intrinsic utility and image-related utility.
We leverage the fact that these two types of utility give rise to different predictions as to whether
users should increase their contributions when their number of followers increases. To address
the issue that the number of followers is endogenous, we conducted a field experiment in which
we exogenously added followers (or follow requests in the case of protected accounts) to a set of
users over a period of time, and compared their posting activities to those of a control group. We
estimated each treated user's utility function using a dynamic discrete choice model. While our
results are consistent with both types of utility being at play, our model suggests that imagerelated
utility is larger for most users. We discuss the implications of our findings for the
evolution of Twitter and the type of value firms may derive from such platforms in the future.
|
 |
| 4/12~4/13 |
|
The 31st UH Marketing Doctoral Symposium
Keynote speaker: Leonard Lodish, Samuel R. Harrell Professor, Wharton School
|
| 4/19/2013 |
David Godes
Maryland
|
"Product Policy in Markets with Word-of-Mouth Communication" Abstract
We investigate the equilibrium relationship between product
quality and word-of-mouth communication. Specifically, we ask whether firms should optimally
produce “better” products when consumers are more likely to exchange information? On the surface,
the answer would seem to be intuitive. Clearly, one might assume, if people are more likely to
"find out" about a product, then its quality should be higher. However, in the face of a lack
of consistent empirical evidence, we make a theoretical argument that the relationship may be
more complicated than it appears. The critical moderating factor in our model is the nature
of the communication and what its primary impact is. On one hand, we might assume that the primary
impact of word of mouth is to help people to better assess the utility of products with
which they are already familiar. If this is the case then, indeed, our model suggests that more
word of mouth should lead to higher-quality products. On the other hand, it is well known that
another significant effect of word of mouth is to expand awareness of a product. In a model
of informative word of mouth - which we define as word of mouth that increases the general awareness
level of a product - we show that quality may either increase or decline as word of mouth expands.
The answer depends, in part, on the extent to which communications are more likely to occur between
consumers of similar taste for quality. Taken together, the two models therefore suggest that the
firm's optimal product-policy response to the growth in social interactions depends on both the
content and the structure of the underlying conversations. In addition, our results also make clear
to researchers the importance of carefully specifying the nature of the social interactions and of
considering the multidimensional effects they may have.
|